Showing posts with label connect. Show all posts
Showing posts with label connect. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

connect closure


2008 is coming to an end... this word has done me good.

it's weird. i have never before had one word seemingly start to apply to everything. i admit, part of it is probably just the simple fact that once you notice something new, you start seeing it everywhere. or once you learn a new word suddenly everyone seems to be using it. and i agree that a lot of what connect came to represent this past year was probably my own construct; but i like to think that it was more than just coincidences. that word had inherent meaning and power. and it challenged me to start to tie it all together. which has not been an easy task...

and now? i know i'm ready for something new. (and i guess that's the point of starting over every twelve months.) but, for melodrama's sake, how will i ever find another word to take it's place? connect left some big shoes to fill.

so the search begins for another word that, ideally i just stumble upon, find to fit surprisingly really well, and run with.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

urbanism


as i'm studying for my urbanism final tomorrow night, i wanted to share this ah-ha moment from our last class. besides the bubbles and circles being beautiful, its so interesting to see the united states through this new lens. it makes sense, a perfect product of post modernity. there is little logic to the old hierarchies of urban and rural anymore. everything is much more regional now. according to our teacher, it's just up to policy and government to catch on to it all. (more public transportation please!)

our latest reading, robert fishman's "megaopolis," introduced the idea of the "city a la carte." it's so accurate. (and all about connecting dots...) the idea is that everyone has a different "city" made of different nodes of experience. the control is in the individual, but that makes it even more impossible to control or categorize from outside. (but let's face it, our city planners and government have never had control...) we basically bounce around between a household bubble, consumption bubble, and a production bubble. to me, this freedom sounds refreshing. (aside from the fact that the typical structure of the city a la carte is the world of shopping malls we have created for ourselves.) when ancb started, it was all about breaking down the walls between homogeneous neighborhoods. looking at it now, baltimore should be more about the individual neighborhoods that each resident makes for themselves. the possibilities with that approach are much greater. think about molding a baltimore second grader's city into one that includes, say, the baltimore museum of art and excludes the drug dealers on the corner.

Friday, May 23, 2008

exchange


jackie and i have set up an exchange system of sorts. i'll make sure she has some art in her life (not that she struggles to fit in the artsy side or anything...) and she'll make sure i have some good old liberal arts in my life (because lord knows that is sort of missing from mica.) together, we have the best of both worlds.

in the first round of our summer exchange, i gave her boys of baraka, a copy of a james baldwin story i read in critical inquiry, the latest issue of the urbanite (tackling crime and violence in cities), and a slew of cds that i meant to send her months ago. the truth is, i need her mind on this stuff too. i reached a point this year where overload stopped being a good thing, and started to make me shut down. instead of feeling energized about all the possibilities, i felt stuck. i need jackie's over-analyzing action on this one.

and in exchange she gave me some fun things to read. the writings of robert motherwell and a reading called "value and meaning." (what more is there, really?)

so tonight i sat down and started in on it. epiphanies x 100. thank you, jackie.

i've been noticing things lately. like, i've been to i don't even know how many tigers games in my life, and suddenly i am bothered by the comerica park microcosm created in the city of detroit. i notice the predominately white crowd (which i happen to be a part of...) and i wonder why the african americans i see are either (1) outside the gates begging for change, (2) working the concession stands for minimum wage, or (3) playing center field. there is very little mixing. maybe that's what bothers me most. this separatism seems to only be defacto segregation. (like my brother's baseball game yesterday at southfield lathrup. how did we get to today, to where we can have such insanely segregated schools and cities?) i guess that's just society. i should shrug it off. so it goes.

but that kind of sucks. usually when my mind goes in too far in that over-analyzing direction i stop myself. there have been times at mica when i've brought up diversity on campus and have been challenged. and i don't know whose ignorance to blame (me or them...) but i am too much of a people pleaser to continue to push that button. even when class discussions turn into diversity debates, i sort of envy the people who are blind to it all. the people who have no worries and wonder why everything has to be about race. and that's where i've been stuck wondering if there is any merit to thinking things should change. there's a fine line between the way things are and the way things could be. and when you operate in that middle ground, it would be stupid not to question your motives for action. sometimes the trust i have in my own truth is not enough. and i need to look for outside reassurance/motivation/inspiration. something that always seems to come in due time.

"the greater the diversity that gets unified, the greater the organic unity; and also the tighter the unity to which the diversity is brought; the greater the organic unity. a monochromatically painted canvas would show a high degree of unity, but since no diversity of color, form, or theme would thereby have been unified, it would not possess a high degree of organic unity. thus a resultant organic unity depends of two things, the degree of diversity and the degree of unity to which that diversity is brought. the task of achieving organic unity is difficult because these two factors tend to vary inversely and so pull in opposite directions. the greater the diversity, the harder it is to bring to it a given degree of unity. something has intrinsic value, i suggest, to the degree that it is organically unified. its organic unity is its value." - robert nozick, "value and meaning"

the "value and meaning" chapter, excerpted from "the examined life," also had some quality connect in context quotes.

"value involves something's being integrated within its own boundaries, while meaning involes its having some connection beyond these boundaries. the problem of meaning itself is raised by the presence of limits. thus, typically, people worry about the meaning of their lives when they see their existences as limited... to seek to give life meaning is to transcend the limits of one's individual life."

"meaning can be gained by linking with something of value. however, the nature of the linkage is important. i cannot give meaning to my life by saying i am linked to advancing justice in the world, where this means that i read the newspapers every day or week and thereby notice how justice and injustice fare. that is too trivial and too insubstantial a link. (still, knowing external things and understanding how they are valuable may constitute a nontrivial link.) the greater the link, the closer, the more forceful, the more intense and extensive it is, the greater the meaning gotten. the tighter the connection with value, the greater the meaning. this tightness of connection means that you are interrelated with the value in a unified way; there is more of an organic unity between you and the value. your connecton with the value, then, is itself valuable; and meaning is gotten through such a valuable connection with value."

so much to process. just starting to squeeze out that sponge...

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

community, connecting, and change


donaghy once told me that as soon as you start finding dots and accepting the challenge of connecting them, the more they start flying out at you. that couldn't be more true than right now.

i met today with someone who is an osi fellow in baltimore. she has been working towards this idea of displaying "art banners" in neighborhoods, and came across "a neighborhood called baltimore" when we had a table set up at the walters a few weeks ago. she sent paula an email, suprised that she had never heard of our project, because it was so similar to what she was working on. i gathered a group of mica students who are all simultaneously working towards the same sort of baltimore oriented stuff (lauren and stephanie from ancb. carey who is working on selecting colors with and for communities. and andy who is making a vectorized map of baltimore, something that has some pretty huge potential.) and we all met with her at cafe doris to hear her plans. i didn't quite know what to think afterwards. what is our role in all of it? besides the obvious connections. and can i really commit to another collaboration? to be honest though, i think she needs us on her team.

afterwards, carey and i talked, each trying to figure out how we felt about the meeting and idea. we're both graphic designers, so the way we see things is very similar. besides the font and color choice on her mock up, there were obvious flaws in her concept that we were able to pick up on just from the work we've done in the community since coming to baltimore. sometime during our conversation we realized that we both have bernard canniffe next monday for graphic design 1. carey started talking about all of the amazing things bernard is doing. and the role he sees graphic design playing in baltimore. he told me about piece studio, which i was clueless about. i had him send me the link to the website right away.

i had the weirdest feeling as i watched the page load and began to read the text. maybe its the feeling that the world isn't as big as you had once thought. that it's even smaller. so many of us are on the same page. how can i have been here for so long, and not know this existed? i can't believe that such a force was coming out of mica, and i had no idea.

and especially to find this all after leaving my critique with fabienne yesterday a little bit unsure about the direction i would be pushed in by the graphic design department next year. now, more than ever, i know that this is where i need to be. next year i will get to learn from, and work with, these extremely talented designers who are practicing design in a way that gets me really giddy. and to go back even further and make a connection... two of them have been big players in something called project m. they did some incredible stuff last summer that i remember reading about in good magazine. i ripped it out and stuck it in my cap sketchbook last summer. because that is truly my idea of community arts.

Saturday, March 8, 2008

neighborhoods


last night i was finally able to sit down and read the latest issue of the urbanite. it was the coolest thing to flip through and find pages and pages of people unknowingly pursuing the same idea: neighborhoods. and even crazier was that the things they were observing and questioning are exactly the same things we are scratching at with a neighborhood called baltimore. this issue was all about something called "the urbanite project."

What is The Urbanite Project?
By Frans Johansson

The author of The Medici Effect explains how the explosion of new ideas at the intersection of different fields can change Baltimore-starting with you:

Let me ask you a question. What is the connection between termites and architecture? Shoe designers and car engineers? Lollipops and sea urchins? Or butterflies and mobile phones?

The connections may not be too obvious at first, but each of those combinations represents a remarkable innovation, and an incredible idea. Those who find such unique connections (almost all of us) and dare to pursue them (a lot fewer of us than should be) are the ones who are breaking new ground. Those people who can step into an intersection of different fields or cultures are those who will change the world.

It may seem quite counterintuitive at first-but the fact is that you have the best chance of breaking new ground if you combine what you know today with ideas or concepts from other fields or cultures. Your best shot at innovation does not, in fact, come from you increasingly specializing in your current field. It may help you change things incrementally, in small, predictable steps. But it shuts you out of more intriguing and groundbreaking discoveries.

Take this guy, Mick Pearce, for instance. He is an architect that received a tough challenge to design an attractive building in Harare, the capital of Zimbabwe, but also, in the design, to get rid of any need for air conditioning.

This may, on the face of it, seem ridiculous. After all, it can get pretty hot in Harare. But Pearce solved the problem by basing his architectural designs on how termites cool their tower-like mounds of mud and dirt.

How was that again?

It turns out termites must keep the internal temperature in their mounds at a constant 87 degrees in order to grow an essential fungus. Not an easy job since temperatures on the African plains can range from above 100 degrees during the day to below 40 at night. Still, the insects manage it by ingeniously directing breezes at the base of the mound into chambers with cool, wet mud, and then redirecting this cooled air to the peak. By constantly building new vents and closing old ones, they can regulate the temperature very precisely.

Pearce's passion for understanding natural ecosystems allowed him to combine the fields of architecture and termite ecology and to bring this combination of concepts to fruition. The office complex, called Eastgate, opened in 1996 and is the largest commercial/retail complex in Zimbabwe. It maintains a steady temperature of 73 to 77 degrees and uses less than ten percent of the energy consumed by other buildings its size. And it saved $3.5 million immediately because they did not have to install an air-conditioning plant.

Pearce had become an innovator-he had changed the world, or at least a small part of it. What, exactly, enabled him to become such a leader? He was not a world-leading expert in architecture and he certainly was not an expert in termite ecology. But he did not have to be. Instead, Pearce used his knowledge within one field and joined it with ideas and concepts from another seemingly unrelated field. He, in other words, stepped into the intersection between those two fields-and struck gold because of it.

Pearce broke new ground, not because he focused relentlessly on one field within one culture. Instead, it was his willingness to explore ideas and concepts outside of his field of expertise that enabled him to break new ground. We can all do this. In fact, in the fast-changing world that has emerged during the last couple of decades, finding such intersections is a requirement. It is the surest way to generate groundbreaking ideas and make them happen.

I call the explosion of new ideas at the intersection of different fields "the Medici Effect," a name derived from a remarkable burst of creativity in fifteenth-century Italy. The Medicis were a banking family in Florence that funded creators from a wide range of disciplines. Thanks to this family and a few others like it, sculptors, scientists, poets, philosophers, financiers, painters, and architects converged upon the city of Florence. There they found each other, learned from one another, and broke down barriers between disciplines. Together they forged a new world based on new ideas-what became known as the Renaissance. As a result, the city became the epicenter of a creative explosion, one of the most innovative eras in history. Leonardo da Vinci is the illustrious standard-bearer of the Renaissance and is the ultimate representation of Europe's most creative explosions of art, culture, and science. The effects of the Medici family can be felt to this day.

We, too, can create the Medici Effect. We can ignite this explosion of extraordinary ideas and take advantage of it as individuals, as teams, and as organizations. We can do it by bringing together different disciplines and cultures and searching for the places where they connect. And there has never been a better time to do this than now.

In my travels around the world, while speaking at corporations and conferences and while talking to innovators of all kinds-entrepreneurs, scientists, designers, executives, artists, policy-makers-it has become very clear that the need for innovation is at a fever pitch. The world is changing at a breathtaking speed-faster than ever before. I have yet to meet an executive who with confidence can tell me where his or her industry will be five years from now. Imagine being an executive in the CD industry in the mid-nineties. You could have the best, most strategic plan to conquer this industry, to become a global market leader. But today you would be dead. You'd be gone. The world is changing fast and we have to change with it. But how?

Today the world is converging in more places than ever before. People move between different countries and our communities get increasingly diverse; science and technology are converging faster than ever before, and the power of the Web connects people between places in ways that only a couple of years ago would have been unthinkable. This convergence is giving rise to more intersections than ever-and more opportunities for each one of us to create the Medici Effect. Everywhere you can see such connections: Nike designers work with General Motors engineers to develop tire patterns that resemble a sneaker's sole (for the H3 Hummer). Marcus Samuelsson, a black chef born in Ethiopia, learns how to cook food around the world and innovates Swedish cuisine at his restaurant Aquavit. He becomes the youngest chef to ever to receive a three-star rating from The New York Times, for dishes such as sea urchin lollipops. Dr. Deborah Prothrow-Stith steps into the intersection of violence prevention and health care and dramatically drops the level of violence and murder in Boston during the 1990s. Groundbreaking ideas spring out of such unusual connections. This is how we innovate; this is how we change our world.

In this issue of Urbanite you will see a few such remarkable collaborations. But any one of you can reach to a field or culture different than your own. If you can find a connection, you may have discovered the best chance to create something new, to change our world.

As it turns out, the single best way of breaking out of the pack is to take what you know right now, today, and combine this knowledge with ideas from other fields, industries, and cultures. When you find those connection points, explore them and prepare for an explosion of groundbreaking ideas.

So what about the intersection between butterflies and mobile phones? I'll let you work that one out for yourself . They are connected, however-and the truth is that most things in this world are connected. The world is, indeed, a connected place. But it wasn't created that way. There has always been someone making the connections.

It could be you.


2008. This year, the project consists of seven teams of collaborators; each team has been asked, What would you do if there were no boundaries? What concern–either here in Baltimore or globally– would you confront if nothing stood in your way? The Urbanite Project aims to explore the possibilities of collaborative innovation and bring that power to bear on the most intractable human problems.


here are the two teams with ideas that stuck out to me, with some excerpts from their articles:


team one: the neighborhood exchange program

"the idiosyncrasies and individual character of these neighborhoods contribute to baltimore's rich texture and coarse charm, but they also reinforce baltimore's stratification and contribute to its entrenched problems. neighborhoods are pitted against one another for shares of city resources, close neighbors willfully ignore problems in adjacent communities, and residents are discouraged-through ingrained habits, prejudices, or political pressure-from straying beyond their neighborhood boundaries."

"each group repeated the theme that a lack of knowledge and communication between adjacent communities cause frustration, confusion, and slow progress on a number of shared issues. during our discussion, several participants expressed beliefs that the department of recreation and parks moves resources from one neighborhood to another without explanation or prior discussion, that the school system makes decisions based more on political maneuvering than neighborhood needs, and that the baltimore development corporation flies under the radar to evade community involvement in major development projects. the lack of communication and human connections between neighborhoods prevents residents from fully comprehending or influencing city government decisions such as these."

"we hope that other neighborhoods will see this as an impetus for their own neighborhood exchange programs, reaching across the walls to meet with the unknown other that we are taught to avoid, combat, or ignore. this idea should not be limited to community groups–any individual can take steps to expand his or her horizons. the goal is to reach out and meet our neighbors, looking outward as well as inward. we believe that a collection of neighbors and neighborhoods can rally around their commonalities and respond to their collective differences, proving literally greater than the sum of their parts."


team six: wired, but not quite ... connected

"historically, neighborhood identities run deep in baltimore, and while that adds to the city's charm, it can work against building the kinds of connections the city needs to reach its full potential." this team used photography to "examine the disconnect and interconnectedness of baltimore's neighborhoods and people."

"we live and work in this giant checkerboard with its more than 250 neighborhoods, each of us only one or two spaces from some community in the grips of the tragic urban trio of crime, poverty, and racial prejudice. yet a multitude of community organizations and outward-looking people persevere. they work to repair communities like weavers mending the urban fabric. they remind us about those being displaced, unable to keep up or ride the wave of progress. they also realize the value of connections, looking outside their neighborhood boundaries to join others and make their case or better their situation. let's hope enough of us are listening."



pretty cool coincidences. let's start making connections.

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

connect in context: chuck klosterman edition


i was flipping through an old friend today when writing my cultural criticism essay for criticial inquiry, and rediscovered this gem:

"there are two ways to look at life. actually, that's not accurate; i suppose there are thousands of ways to look at life. but i tend to dwell on two of them. the first view is that nothing stays the same and that nothing is inherently connected, and that the only driving force in anyone's life is entropy. the second is that everything pretty much stays the same (more or less) and that everything is completely connected, even if we don't realize it. there are many mornings when i feel certain that the first perspective is irrefutably true: i wake up, i feel the inescapable oppression of the sunlight pouring through my bedroom window, and i am struck by the fact that i am alone. and that everyone is alone. and that everything i understood seven hours ago has already changed, and that i have to learn everything again. i guess i am not a morning person. however, that feeling always passes. in fact, it's usually completely gone before lunch. every new minute of every new day seems to vaguely improve. and i suspect that's because the alternative view - that everything is ultimately like something else and that nothing and no one is autonomous - is probably the greater truth. the math does check out; the numbers do add up. the connections might not be hard-wired into the superstructure to the universe, but it feels like they are whenever i put money into a jukebox and everybody in the bar suddenly seems to be having the same conversation. and in that last moment before i fall asleep each night, i understand everything. the world is one interlocked machine, throbbing and pulsing as a flawless organism. this is why i hate falling asleep."

-from the introduction to "sex, drugs, and cocoa puffs" by chuck klosterman

connect in context: sculpture


this was my response to a "serial abstraction" assignment for sculpture. the point was to grow or dilate sculptural form by combining materials (pvc pipes) in succession, with emphasis on attachment (drilling and dowels).


i didn't realize until i was way over my head with it the night before how big a role connecting played. the intensity of rushing to get it done, and not sure if it was actually possible, reminded me of this line from a post last week.

Monday, February 25, 2008

connect in context


"there he stood, coordinating all of these thoughts with the intensity of one who knew that if he did not, all would fall apart."

words from james barth, an artist featured in mica's "dark poets" exhibition.

Thursday, February 21, 2008

Sunday, February 10, 2008

you can leave the ship but the ship won't leave you


i had my first real college leadership conference yesterday. it was a collaboration between mica and the university of baltimore. it was pretty basic. but it felt so good to just be in that kind of environment again. i missed it.

one of the sessions was called "true colors." we took one of those classic leadership styles quizes & identified ourselves with a color. i've done many a personality quiz in my day. but for some reason it was good to take one apart from high school leadership activities & apply it to my college leadership experiences. especially recently with all this program manager stuff kicking in to high gear, i've been trying to see how my leadership style from avondale will fit in with the student activities office at mica.

i was green. it was nice find my truth in the typically generic generalizations. the facilitators described greens as sponges. they talked about greens just soaking everything in, and needing to stop and squeeze it all out and process it on their own. which is very true. one kid (who was obviously green) asked with all seriousness where the water went when it got squeezed out of the sponge. (ummm... so he missed the boat with the metaphor.) but i thought about it, and realized this blog is totally where i squeeze out my sponge. (speaking of blogging & sponges... my friend stephanie started her own blog! she's been talking about it for awhile & finally went for it. so glad i was able to convince someone to try the whole blog thing out. it really is such a good outlet.) here's more about green...

green:

expects intelligence and competence
seeks for ways to improve systems
standard setter
perfectionist and quality conscious
serious
theoretical and conceptual
seeks "big" picture
looks at the world and sees possibilities, meanings and relationships
architects of change
sets high standards
visionary/futurist
analytical
philosophical
can see the core of complex issues or problems
can never know enough
appears cool, calm, collected
needs independence and private time
encourages change for improvement
constantly in process of change
are challenged most when someone says it can't be done

and that's me in a nut shell.

at the end of the day i basically wrote an essay on the back of my evaluation form. don't get me wrong, it was a good conference. the idea was to put leaders from mica and university of baltimore together. and it's important to put the idea out there and in motion for a few years before you build on it. but i think it can be bigger. the good old leadership conference planner in me had a strong urge the whole day to start project planning for a leadership conference that would involve all of the schools in the baltimore collegetown network. if the idea is connecting (key word!) & really mingling with other students, that there needs to be more that just familiar mica faces and a smattering of kids. i see mega mixers, lots of networking & idea swapping, and allowing the experienced leaders to plan and facilitate their own sessions and pass on advice to emerging leaders. that's my vision. we'll see what happens...

Sunday, January 13, 2008

ann arbor, street art, and connecting the dots


this past weekend i went out to ann arbor to visit jackie at u of m. i needed to get the true college experience out of my system. (you know, studying at starbucks, frat parties, lecture halls, dorms with community bathrooms...) and i needed to go to show that i support her & all the choices she has made to get her there. michigan suits her. it helped me to know that we are both in the right place.

when i got back there was an email from donaghy. some inspiration. he had seen banksy on the news today and wanted to pass on the link to his website.

here's where i start making connections.

there's a kid at my school, andrew, who does amazing street art. amazing. he's one of the kids i met at the baltimore/fear discussion. i found his flickr account and was floored. seriously cool stuff.

also, we had a presentation/lecture in art matters this past semester about graffiti. (and a baltimore graffiti tour in elements.) and i remembered afterwards about that whole turtle thing in detroit a few years back. i googled it to see what would come up. to see what the situation is like now and how it's being recorded as history. i hit the jackpot and found a site for a documentary titled "paint cans and politics." it was so intriguing.

and jackie and i took photos in a graffiti covered ann arbor alleyway yesterday for a future art project. they turned out pretty cool. it's weird. when i was little that stuff used to really bother me. now i can appreciate it. i guess decay never sits well with me. mentally filling in the foreword to things falling apart always makes me uneasy. (and also sometimes extremely motivated.) but it helps to pull forward the art inherent in those situations/settings.

jackie wanted to use a line from imogen heap to describe it.
"there's beauty in the breakdown."

Tuesday, January 1, 2008